Way of eating that seems to work - Carnivore/Lion

I have been following diets prepared by my medical consultants for nearly 34 years and found that my diabetic and heart disease markers had been getting worse. My doctors repeatedly told me that food had no impact on the inevitable outcome of becoming insulin resistant. However, about four years ago, I decided to try the carnivore/lion way of eating. At first, it was challenging, as it became clear that following my doctors' instructions had turned me into a sugar addict. But within a year I found exceptional changes—so many changes, in fact, that I started to really question the advice I had been given from the medical professionals. I have now been on the carnivore/lion way of eating for four years, and I will never return to consuming carbs. Not only had my previously nonexistent testosterone made a comeback as being produced naturally, but I have no markers for diabetes, insulin resistance, or, aside from higher LDL-C cholesterol, anything that would indicate heart disease. I have no autoimmune diseases, I have tons of energy and mental acuity, and I sleep so completely that every morning I wake refreshed to tackle the day. So this makes me think someone is pulling a fast one when treating people with Klinefelter's syndrome, because if this was the outcome of giving my body enough LDL-C to make its own testosterone, then was it really necessary to administer injections some 34 years ago? Or was the medical system attempting to create yet another addict?



I still see specialists, and they all strive to discredit my way of eating while at the same time telling me I look so healthy and my blood work just doesn't show any concern other than LDL-C cholesterol. I then mention that in the early 50s, the safe value for LDL-C cholesterol was 400, but it was later adjusted to 150. Could you explain the reason for this change? In the 1950s, the proportion of obese individuals was less than 7%. But now with much tighter LDL-C restrictions, the number of obese in America is 70%. So clearly reducing the safe limit of LDL-C is not curbing heart disease or diabetes but rather justification for more medication. 



And there is the Oreo Cookie study, which showed that consumption of Oreo cookies performed better than taking statins at lowering LDL-C cholesterol. Other studies have also shown that consuming Twinkies and Little Debbie cakes performed better than using statins. And statins have been found to contribute to dementia and muscle and bone degradation, and over the course of a lifetime of use, they did not curb heart disease and could only prove to have lengthened the life of the patient by one day. I have seen a study on the comparison between people who had high LDL and those who did not, and those with high LDL lived longer and never got dementia or had a heart attack or stroke compared to those who sought to lower their LDL. But they did not look into HDL and triglycerides, both of which are managed by exercise and consumption of sugars and seed oils. The key factor is eliminating foods that either contribute to high blood sugar or mimic its elevation. 



I'm going to go eat some meat...